Testseek.de haben 347 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 84% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4.
March 2017
(84%)
347 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
(98%)
17 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
840100347
Die Autoren gefallen
Verstarkte PCIe-Slot
Anpassbare RGB-Beleuchtung
Viele Features (3D-Druck etc.)
Overclocking-Funktionen
Hohe Leistung
Guter Onboard-Audiochip
Viele Anschlussmoglichkeiten
7Zip v18.03
Cinebench R15
Handbrake 1.10 YT60p
Handbrake 1.10 HEVC4K
Lightroom Classic 2018
Premiere Pro CC 2018
Keine größeren Unterschiede zu den großen Ryzen-Modellen
Nur ein geringerer Takt
Sehr gute Energieeffizienz dank 65W TDP
Große Übertaktungsmöglichkeiten (prozentual)
Sehr gutes Preis/-Leistungsverhältnis
Sehr hohes Arbeitstempo
Sehr hohes Tempo bei komplexen Berechnungen
Moderater Stromverbrauch
Acht Kerne
Virtuelle Kernverdoppelung
Hohe Spieleleistung
Sehr hohe Anwendungsleistung
Kaum langsamer als die anderen Ryzen-7-CPUs
Niedrige Leistungsaufnahme unter Last
Niedrige Temperaturen unter Last
Freier Multiplikator und hilfreiche Software f
Tolle Preis-Leistung
Hohe Effizienz
Die Autoren nicht gefallen hat
Kein U.2-Anschluss
Nur 1 M.2-Anschluss
Deutlich geringere Grundtaktfrequenz
Mäßige Spieleperformance im Vergleich zum Core i7-7700K bei niedrigen Auflösungen
Plattform ist neu und (noch) nicht fehlerfrei
Somit sind Bios-Updates nötig
Spiele-Benchmarks (2)
Kein Grafikchip an Bord
Recht niedrige Standard-Taktrate
In Full HD oft langsamer als Core i7-CPUs von Intel
Veröffentlicht: 2017-08-02, Autor: Steven , Testbericht von: techspot.com
We have some interesting results to discuss. Let's start with the Core i7-6900K and 7820X.It was shocking to find that when comparing clock-for-clock performance using the same memory speed on both setups, the older 6900K was faster in every single game w...
Great value for money considering its multi-threaded performance and more than decent single thread performance, Easily overclocks should the need ever arise, Default power requirement is pretty low considering it is an eight-core processor, The cheapest
Lack of game optimization makes Intel quad-cores a better bet, Draws excessive power when overclocked, Single thread performance does not come close to Intel flagship models, Should You Buy The AMD Ryzen 1700
The Ryzen 1700 is a much welcome addition to the CPU marketplace and one that will definitely force Intel to up its game. Even if the 1800X does not manage to topple Intel top performers, it will force Intel to reduce its costs.We feel with time and more...
Zusammenfassung: Its hard to believe considering we just finished up an Intel launch, but it is already time to check out Intel’s next launch. Kaby Lake was launched at the beginning of this year and the Mainstream lineup of CPUs is getting refreshed with Coffee Lake and Z370. This is the 8th generation of Intel’s Core processors going back to the original launch back in 2006...
Zusammenfassung: Although we've already posted a “first looks” preview of how the Ryzen 7 1700 performs online, we're finally getting around to giving this processor its due. Read on to see if this is the perfect Ryzen for you.This Summit Ridge processor equipped with two...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
(80%)
Veröffentlicht: 2017-05-22, Autor: Chris , Testbericht von: channelpostmea.com
Zusammenfassung: One of the biggest advantages of the latest AMD Ryzen 7 1800X and 1700X 8-core processors over the Intel i7-6900K is that they are far more affordable with a performance that almost matches head-on. And if you think that the new Ryzen 7 chips are still ou...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2017-05-11, Autor: Rafael , Testbericht von: hardwaresecrets.com
Comparing the results of the Ryzen 7 1700 benchmarks to the the Core i7-7700K, it is clear that, in some testes (like the Cinebench R15), the Ryzen 7 1700 is far superior (because of its number of cores and threads). On the other hand, in other tests and...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-05-08, Autor: Mark , Testbericht von: arstechnica.com
Remarkable multithreaded performance, More core and threads than the competition, 1600X on par with a stock i5 7600K in gaming, The full-featured AM4 platform, Excellent value for money
Questions remain over gaming performance, Some early adopter quirks linger, Overclocking not as strong as Kaby Lake
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Ian , Testbericht von: anandtech.com
We have already shown in previous reviews that the Zen microarchitecture from AMD is around the equivalent of Intel's Broadwell microarchitecture, but at this lower price point we have AMD's Zen against Intel's Kaby Lake, which is two generations newer th...
Well, the Ryzen 7 launch has a surprising amount of excitement and drama mixed together with the impressive numbers but with memory issues and game performance causing very polarized opinions on social media and on websites like Reddit. AMD fans even...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-06, Autor: Paul , Testbericht von: tomshardware.com
Unlocked ratio multiplier, Lowcost eight core, 65W TDP, Bundled cooler
Lower stock performance than other Ryzen 7 models, Lower game performance than Intel processors, Poorly optimized software ecosystem
The 1700 performs well in heavily threaded workloads, but lags behind Intel's quad cores in most gaming scenarios. However, the Ryzen 7 1700 also offers the lowest entry-level price point for a modern eight-core processor and features enough overclock...
