Testseek.de haben 293 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 87% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Socket AM4 .
March 2017
(87%)
293 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
-
0 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
870100293
Die Autoren gefallen
7Zip v18.03
Cinebench R15
Handbrake 1.10 YT60p
Handbrake 1.10 HEVC4K
Lightroom Classic 2018
Premiere Pro CC 2018
Nur geringe Unterschiede zum großen Ryzen 7 1800X
Weiterhin sehr gute Energieeffizienz
Größere Übertaktungsmöglichkeiten (prozentual)
Besseres Preis-Leistungsverhältnis als Ryzen 7 1800X
Leistung
Kabelverlegung
Hochwertige Komponenten
Tolle Preis-Leistung
Hohe Effizienz
Sehr hohes Arbeitstempo
Sehr hohes Tempo bei komplexen Berechnungen
Moderater Stromverbrauch
Acht Kerne
Virtuelle Kernverdoppelung
Hohe Spieleleistung
Sehr hohe Anwendungsleistung
Nur minimal langsamer als der Ryzen 7 1800X
Relativ niedrige Leistungsaufnahme unter Last
Niedrige Temperaturen unter Last
Recht hohe Taktraten für eine Achtkern
Die Autoren nicht gefallen hat
Mäßige Spieleperformance im Vergleich zum Core i7-7700K bei niedrigen Auflösungen
Plattform ist neu
Somit Biosupdates zu erwarten
Spiele-Benchmarks (2)
Leichte Schwäche im PCMark 8
Kein Grafikchip an Bord
In Full HD oft langsamer als Core i7-CPUs von Intel
AMD sees Ryzen 7 processors as being the perfect fit for multi-threaded (nT) work with slightly lower single threaded (1T) performance. Our testing shows that is true for the most part. In applications where all cores are being used the 8-Core, 16-Thread...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-03-02, Autor: Marco , Testbericht von: hothardware.com
Strong Overall Performance, 8-Cores / 16-Threads, Power Friendly, Aggressive Pricing
Issues In A Few Benchmarks, Unimpressive Overclocking In Early Stages
It's not all good news, though. With some legacy apps, audio encoding, lower-res gaming, and platform level tests, Ryzen trailed Intel – sometimes by a wide margin. There is obviously still optimization work that needs to be done – from both AMD and softw...
Zusammenfassung: These days there are basically two different groups of customers who demand lots of processing power: content creators and gamers, while this 2D performance comparison is targeting content creators. After having had a look at the following pages you'll ha...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2018-05-06, Autor: Peter , Testbericht von: eteknix.com
For the desktop PC gamer, the higher TDP X models are still the go-to for gaming and general performance though. They're a little faster, and a little more expensive, but you get what you pay for. However, if heat and power are a big concern to you, and t...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-05-06, Autor: Peter , Testbericht von: eteknix.com
I can see the Ryzen 5 2600 and the 2600X fast becoming the most popular chips of the second generation Ryzen launch. They're fast, they're affordable, and they're easy to keep cool and overclock. I mean, if you're just doing a massive amount of rendering...
Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...
Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
Auszeichnung
-
Veröffentlicht: 2017-12-05, Autor: Richard , Testbericht von: eurogamer.net
There's a range of advice we can offer to any prospective Ryzen owners. First, the more expensive 1800X is only recommended if you want the fastest possible stock processor, no matter what the cost. Highly clocked out of the box, there's not a huge amount...
Zusammenfassung: AMD hadn't just announced a new processor architecture, but the dawning of a new manufacturing process in which the chips would be based on, 14nm which was a first for AMD. Not only was their new 14nm FinFET process to be more energy efficient, but would...
