Testseek.de haben 305 Experten-Bewertungen der Western Digital 3.5 inch NAS Red SATA600 WD-EFAX / WD-EFRX / WD-EFZX / WD-EFFX Series und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 85% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Western Digital 3.5 inch NAS Red SATA600 WD-EFAX / WD-EFRX / WD-EFZX / WD-EFFX Series.
September 2013
(85%)
305 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
(92%)
2379 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
850100305
Die Autoren gefallen
Speicherkapazitat
Sehr laufruhig
Sequenzielle Transferleistung
Niedrige Temperaturentwicklung
Hohe sequenzielle Transferleistung
Ansprechender Preis pro Gigabyte
Schwingungserkennung und -dampfung
Fur den Dauerbetrieb geeignet
Hohe Kapazität
24x7Freigabe
Niedriger Stromverbrauch
Niedrige Geräuschentwicklung
Hohe Geschwindigkeit (sequentiell bis zu 210 MB/s)
Optimierung für 24x7Betrieb in NASSystemen
3 Jahre Garantie
Leises Betriebsgeräusch
Niedriger Energieverbrauch unter Last
Geringe Wärmeentwicklung
Hohe Lese- und Schreibraten
Hohe Speicherdichte
Leiser und kühler Betrieb
Geeignet für Dauerbetrieb und RAID
Gute Performance
Günstiger Preis
Beeindruckende Zugriffszeiten
Stromsparend
Garantiezeit
Günstiger Preis für 6 TB
Relativ leise im Betrieb
Angemessener Verbrauch
Gute Transferraten
Optimiert und zertifiziert für NAS-Einsatz
Spezielle NASWare-Firmware
Geringer Stromverbrauch
Leiser Betrieb
Sehr leise
Geringe Hitzebildung
Geringe CPU-Belastung
Extrem leise
Besonders stromsparend
Günstiges Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Vergleichsweise geringer Stromverbrauch
Gute Leistungen im Praxistest
Leise
Die Autoren nicht gefallen hat
Erreicht nicht die Performance einer Festplatte mit 7.200 U/Min
Teurer als die Konkurrenz
Hoher Stromverbrauch
Deutliche Zugriffsgeräusche
Recht hohes Betriebsgeräusch
Weiterhin nur 1 pro 10^14 nicht behebbare Fehler pro gelesenem Bit
I'll preface this conclusion by saying that there are more 6TB hard drive reviews en route. It'd be nice to test out the WD Green, for starters, although I don't think it's that necessary. I believe it should perform just about the same as this Red driv...
When considering the WD alternatives, both Red and Green drives seemed priced appropriately and ran cool and quiet throughout testing. We have nothing to complain about, as they seemed to do the job and won't require the cost upside we saw with Seagate's offering. All in all, we're happy to recommend all three drives, but there are caveats to that all-important price performance curve that you'll have to calculate for yourself, based on your specific needs and wants...
Zusammenfassung: We received updated samples from WD, as well as applying a firmware update to the samples used in our original review. We were able to confirm that the update does in fact work, and brings a WD60EFRX-68MYMN 0 to the identical and improved performance char...
Veröffentlicht: 2014-09-02, Autor: Lawrence , Testbericht von: silentpcreview.com
Zusammenfassung: The WD Red 1TB (2.5 inch) and 6TB.Undersides.The Red drives we're going to examine today come in starkly different form factors. The Red 6TB is more of what we've seen before, the latest high capacity desktop flagship for users with limited drive bays who...
Largest NAS HDD available, Great 8K performance, Upgraded NASware features
Trade-off in random access performance with slower spindle speed
For those looking maximize their storage capabilities in a NAS, the WD Red 6TB drives are a great option. Not only to they perform very well, but they offer 2TB more capacity than anything else currently in the market on a third generation platform that h...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2014-07-21, Autor: Twitter
Terry , Testbericht von: wegotserved.com
sCutting through the benchmarks, what does all this mean?Firstly, if you're using a NAS with traditional (non-NAS specific) hard drives, then switching to a WD Red drive (or one of its competitors, like Seagate NAS hard drives) may provide a bump in file...
Build Quality (MTBF Of 1.000.000 Hours), Good Performance Levels, NASware 2.0 Technology (Low Temperatures/Noise Levels/Power
Raw Performance (However More Than Enough For NAS Use),
Although we don't do power consumption tests on HDDs cause quite frankly it's very hard to be 100% on the spot with such results we did perform our usual temperature and noise level tests both of which showcase that Western Digital has indeed invested tim...
Veröffentlicht: 2014-06-05, Autor: The , Testbericht von: hardwarebbq.com
The performance of the 4TB is a very good enough on most counts for a network storage drive. The performance of the Red Series so far remains consistent. Even if you look at average access tests, not only it performs better than Seagate' 4TB NAS counte...
Zusammenfassung: The Western Digital Red family of NAS hard disk drives is quite an interesting enhancement of the Western Digital Green family of low-powered, slower-spinning hard disk drives (formerly known as the Western Digital Caviar Green family). It is basicall....
Zusammenfassung: Despite being first to market with a NAS-targeted hard drive, WD has proven itself to be the late one on offering a 4TB model – Seagate beat it to the punch just a couple of months earlier. It was a little baffling that WD didn't offer the top-density mod...
