Testseek.de haben 144 Experten-Bewertungen der Samsung 2.5 inch 860 Evo Series SATA600 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 88% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Samsung 2.5 inch 860 Evo Series SATA600.
January 2018
(88%)
144 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
(97%)
12807 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
880100144
Die Autoren gefallen
Preis/Leistung erscheint sehr gut
Schnell in allen Disziplinen
Hohe Lebenserwartung
Praktische Samsung Software inklusiv
AESVerschlüsselung
Sehr schnell in allen Disziplinen
Sehr hohe Lebenserwartung
Geringer Stromverbrauch
Praktische Samsung So
Sequenzielle und zufallige Leseleistung
Verarbeitung
3D-NAND TLC-Speicher und SLC-Cache funktionieren gut
Deutlich gesteigertes Schreibvolumen (TBW) gegenuber Vorgangermodell
AES-Verschlusselung
Sehr gute Performance
Hervorragende Performance-Stabilität unter Dauerlast
Mit bis zu vier Terabyte Speicherkapazität verfügbar
Unterstützung für alle gängigen Verschlüsselungsstandards
5 Jahre Garantie
€ 0
00/GiB
Starke Transferraten
4 TByte Speicherplatz
Attraktiver Preis pro GByte
Performance
Herstellergarantie
Abmessungen
Hohe Geschwindigkeit
Kompatibilität
Garantiezeit + TBW-Werte
Schneller Datentransfer
Hohe Programmbeschleunigung
Geringe Zugriffszeit
Programm zur Datenübertragung im Paket (Samsung Data Migration 3.0)
Erzeugt im Betrieb wenig Wärme
Sehr niedriger Preis je GByte
Hervorragende Performance beim Lesen
Top-Performance für eine SATA-SSD
2 TByte Speicherplatz
Gutes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Übertrifft Herstellerangaben
Preis
Angesichts der gebotenen Leistung vergleichsweise günstig
Die Autoren nicht gefallen hat
Aufpreis zur 860 Evo nur bedingt gerechtfertigt
"nur" noch 5 Jahre Garantie
Unterschiedliche Netto-Kapazität trotz gleicher Herstellerangabe zwischen EVO und PRO
Veröffentlicht: 2018-02-21, Autor: Billy , Testbericht von: anandtech.com
Samsung's update to their TLC SATA SSD is not quite as impressive as the improvements the MLC-based 860 PRO showed, but the Samsung 860 EVO's gains are still enough to put Samsung back on top in that product segment. The competition had caught up to the 8...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-02-14, Autor: Marco , Testbericht von: hothardware.com
Strong Performance, Good Endurance Rating, 5 Year Warranty, Competitive Pricing
SATA Is Old Hat, NVMe M.2 Drives Not Much More Expensive
Samsung SSD 860 EVO SATA Solid State Drives - Find Them At AmazonThe Samsung SSD 860 EVO is available in a variety of capacities, depending on the form factor, at prices ranging from about $95 for a 250GB drive on up to approximately $1,400 for a 4TB mode...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-02-14, Autor: Les , Testbericht von: thessdreview.com
Through introduction of the Samsung 860 EVO, Samsung has done two things that make the EVO a great introduction; they have made it current with their latest 64-Bit 3D TLC V-NAND and they have given more power to their MJX controller, thus creating faster...
Excellent performance on a par with MLC drives, Very affordable, Very fast with small queued writes
Less long-lived than the MLC (2-bit) SSDs
The 860 EVO is the fastest TLC SSD we've tested, albeit by a gnat's eyebrow. But a win is a win, and given the same price, we recommend it over the WD Blue 3D and Sandisk Ultra 3D. That said, you'll be more than happy with any of the three, so if you find...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-02-11, Autor: HP , Testbericht von: relaxedtech.com
Fantastic Performance, Up To 4TB Capacity, Higher Write Endurance Than Competition, Samsung Magician Software, Hardware-Based Encryption, Five-Years Warranty
Expensive, The biggest downside of the 860 Evo 500GB is its high pricetag which will definitely push some people away because there are cheaper alternatives out there that perform just as good as the 860 Evo. Its steep pricing makes it difficult to recom
I believe the Samsung 860 Evo 500GB SSD deserves our Gold award.Final Score9.8« Home Page »Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. comments powered by Disqus...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
Auszeichnung
(98%)
Veröffentlicht: 2018-02-08, Autor: Chris , Testbericht von: tomshardware.com
Strong Performance, Exceptional Software Package With DRAM Cache and Cloning, ClassLeading Endurance, Name Recognition and Reliability
Lower Than Expected Native TLC Performance, The SATA Performance Ceiling
The 860 EVO 250GB is the strongest in the 860 EVO family. There are other 256GB-class SSDs that cost less, but the difference is smaller in this capacity. The 860 EVO 250GB is faster than the competition and you don't have to pay a big premium to get...
Impressive 565/537 MBps read/write speed with ATTO, Random 4K read/writes produced 95,016 IOPS, Samsung MJX controller supports TRIM and NCQ, Samsung 64-cell layer V-NAND doubles TBW durability, TCG/Opal 2.0 security automatic 256-bit AES hardware encryp
Small 512MB DRAM cache buffer (on 250/500GB models)
Our performance rating compares how effective the 500GB Samsung SSD 860 EVO performed in benchmark operations against competing SATA-based solid state drive storage solutions. For reference, Samsung specifications suggest 550 MB/s maximum reads and 520 MB...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
Auszeichnung
(91%)
Veröffentlicht: 2018-02-05, Autor: Adam , Testbericht von: storagereview.com
The 500GB Samsung 860 EVO SSD fails to deliver in performance and comes at a premium price. For light users though, the EVO will probably get the job done and may be an option when pricing is more aggressive...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-02-02, Autor: Mike , Testbericht von: gamecrate.com
Zusammenfassung: Samsung's 960 EVO and 960 PRO M.2 SSDs are known as some of the fastest on the market. Now Samsung is introducing a whole new series of solid state drives with the hopes of continuing that tradition of high performance.Filling a gap between the 850 and th...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2018-01-26, Autor: Christian , Testbericht von: notebookcheck.net
Samsung 860 Pro & 860 Evo, made available by SamsungDuring the test, the new 860 series achieves very good results within its class and can once again outdo its popular predecessor. In particular, the 4K values and access times were further optimized. Thi...
