Testseek.de haben 21 Experten-Bewertungen der Kingston DataTraveler Mini 3.0 USB3 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 84% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Kingston DataTraveler Mini 3.0 USB3.
(84%)
21 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nicht die volle Speicherkapazität, geringe Schreibleistung bei kleinen Dateien, keine Software und keine Extras
Die Anfangs festgestellten Unterschiede zwischen SanDisk und Kingston relativeren sich, wenn man ein Produkt wie den Kingston DataTraveler Mini 3.0 unter die Lupe nimmt. Denn viele USB3.0-Speichersticks sind nur bedingt leistungsfähiger als ihre USB2.0-K...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2016-02-28, Autor: The , Testbericht von: hardwarebbq.com
Slim form factor, Aluminium design, 5Year Warranty
WriteSpecific performance, Uncompressed files transfer speed for a USB 3.0
I wouldn't recommend transferring non-compressed and/or large file unless you can afford to wait. The drive is much slower than a much older Kingston DT Ultimate 32GB.While this wouldn't be great for people who want great write-specific performance, this...
Veröffentlicht: 2015-06-15, Autor: Mark , Testbericht von: Bjorn3d.com
Price, Reliability, 32 GB, Mini Size, Price, Reliability, 32 GB, Mini Size
Not The Fastest, Not The Fastest
For a no frills USB 3.0 thumb drive, the Kingston 32GB USB 3.0 DataTraveler Mini has pretty good performance in many cases, coming in well above the advertised read speed of 70MB/s and easily beating the write speed of 15MB/s. The 43¢ per gigabyte bargain...
Veröffentlicht: 2014-11-25, Autor: Brian , Testbericht von: pcmag.com
Zusammenfassung: Ever look at your basic flash drive and think "Why can't this be more streamlined?" If so, then the 16GB Kingston DataTraveler Mini 3.0 ($22.99) is for you. This compact drive trims the fat, leaving little more than the USB connector and giving you a driv...
Veröffentlicht: 2014-11-25, Autor: Brian , Testbericht von: pcmag.com
Speedy USB 3.0 connection. Compact design. Affordable pricing.
Small size makes it easy to lose
The 16GB Kingston DataTraveler Mini 3.0 is a great flash drive on its own, with a compact design and decent performance, but the under-$25 price is icing on the cake....
Overall Build Quality, Small Size & Lightweight, Read Speeds, Design, Available Capacity, Price (For Some), Available Colors (For Some), , ,
Write Performance (For Some),
When Kingston told us that they were sending a tiny USB 3.0 compatible flash drive with a capacity of 64GB i was quite intrigued to see how it would do at least up until the moment i read its specifications sheet and learned that it has a read speed of up...
Veröffentlicht: 2014-04-28, Autor: Richard , Testbericht von: bigbruin.com
Decent read speeds, Small size makes it very portable, Inxpensive at about $9 US, 5year warranty
Slow write speeds, Please drop by the Bigbruin.com Forum and feel free to post any comments or questions.
While not one of the fastest drive I have used, the Kingston DataTraveler Mini 16GB USB 3.0 flash drive definitely has its appeal. Write speeds of just over 10MB/s are unimpressive, but read speeds of over 80MB/s are respectable and good enough for readin...
Veröffentlicht: 2014-02-27, Autor: Steven , Testbericht von: legitreviews.com
If you are looking for a tiny USB 3.0 flash drive, then the Kingston DataTraveler Mini 3.0 might be a perfect choice. It is smaller than a standard AA battery, measuring only 1.67inches! Made out of aluminum, it utilizes a cap-less design so there is noth...
Veröffentlicht: 2014-02-06, Autor: Chris , Testbericht von: technologyx.com
The Kingston DataTraveler Mini 3.0 USB flash drive provides excellent performance in an extremely small and light form factor. It is well deserving of the Technology X Top Value award!...
Zusammenfassung: We tested 42 USB 3.0 memory sticks with a storage capacity of at least 32 GB. As one might have expected, transfer speeds vary greatly, ranging from painfully slow to lightning fast. Which one should you buy? Around two years ago, when we last perfor...
