Testseek.de haben 233 Experten-Bewertungen der LG G Watch und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 65% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu LG G Watch.
(65%)
233 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
(90%)
90 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
650100233
Die Autoren gefallen
3
0
Kontra
Akkulaufzeit
Schwach
Apps
Geringe Anzahl
Hohes Verarbeitungniveau
Austauschbare
Standardisierte Armbänder
Einfaches Laden per Schale
Display mit guter Farbdarstellung ausreichender Schärfe
Wichtigen Daten werden permanent eingeblendet
Das erste Gerät mit Android Wear
Hohe Verarbeitungsqualität (IP67)
Flotte Performance (Snapdragon 400)
Wasserdicht nach IP67
Starker Prozessor
Hohe Spracherkennungsrate
Intuitive Benutzeroberfläche
Einfache Installation von Apps
Solide Verarbeitung
Software flüssig
Preiswert
Wasserfest gemäß IP67
Clevere Ladefunktion
Flotte Smartwatch
Staub und Wasserdicht nach IP67
Integriertes Mikro für Spachsteuerung
Wasserdicht
Gute Verarbeitung
Angenehmes Tragegefühl
Performance
Gut funktionierende Benachrichtigungen
IP67 zertifiziert
Teils nützliche Features
Flotte Performance
IP67-Zertifizierung
Preis-Leistungs-König
Die Autoren nicht gefallen hat
Spracherkennung
Gut
Akkulaufzeit
Schwach
Bedienung
Intelligent gelöste Nutzerführung
Apps
Geringe Anzahl
Kurze Akkulaufzeiten
Armband mit geringer Wertigkeit
Display nicht immer hell genug
G Watch und Android Wear im Einsatz
Enttäuschendes Display
Mit durchschnittlich 24 Stunden viel zu kurze Akkulaufzeit (trotz hoher Akkukapazität)
Intuitive to use, Excellent for Android power users, Water and dust resistant
Battery life is poor, Unit is easily marked
Given the amount of time it has taken for someone to really nail the smartwatch concept, it's tempting to suggest that perhaps the idea of wearable tech isn't all it's cracked up to be. However, we're inclined to believe that all the idea needed was the...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
(70%)
Veröffentlicht: 2014-07-11, Autor: Sophie , Testbericht von: stuff.tv
Android Wear is mostly brilliant, Comfortable to wear, Compatible with most Android devices, Waterproof
Battery life, Needs a charging cradle, Uninspired design
Open Gallery The G Watch gets a lot right and not that much wrong. And in Android Wear, it has the best smartwatch OS we've seen: it's somehow incredibly simple and awesomely ambitious at the same time. But while we'd definitely choose the G Wa...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
(80%)
Veröffentlicht: 2014-07-11, Autor: Michael , Testbericht von: trustedreviews.com
Google Now notifications work well, Accurate voice recognition, Reasonable selection of early Android Wear apps
The LG G Watch showcases the potential of Android Wear, but the hardware is just not up to scratch. The wait for the definitive smartwatch continues....
Veröffentlicht: 2014-07-04, Autor: Scott , Testbericht von: CNET.co.uk
The G Watch shows off Android Wear's impressive voice recognition, Android phone connectedness, and potential for future app support. It has solid build quality, is water- and dust-resistant, and the included magnetic charger is easy to use
A generic-looking design; terrible battery life; a display that doesn't work in bright sunlight; a strange card-based notification system that doesn't always pop info you want; costs more, lacks the heart-rate monitor, and has a slightly weaker display th
The LG G Watch attempts to bring you the future on your wrist, but with its generic design, unimpressive battery life, and unpolished early software, you're better off waiting to see what else is around the bend....
The first thing that hits you about the LG G Watch is just how much the Android Wear OS dominates the experience. LG has created a product which is subtle and understated, and this allows Google's smartwatch concept to shine through, Compared to the compl
Smartwatches have always struggled when it comes to stamina, and the G Watch is sadly no exception. With normal use you can expect to get around two days before needing to charge, and because you can only topup the battery with the bespoke charging dock,
Google set out to redefine the concept of the smartwatch with its Android Wear platform, and while the G Watch hits a lot of high points, it's doesn't quite knock the ball out of the park. Battery life isn't fantastic, and the body in which LG had placed ...
Intuitive to use, Excellent for Android power users, Water and dust resistant
Battery life is poor, Unit is easily marked
Given the amount of time it has taken for someone to really nail the smartwatch concept, it's tempting to suggest that perhaps the idea of wearable tech isn't all it's cracked up to be. However, we're inclined to believe that all the idea needed was the...
Veröffentlicht: 2014-06-28, Autor: Marc , Testbericht von: techradar.com
Nice design, Vivid display, Voice recognition
Low battery life, Usefulness is subjective, No heart, rate monitor
The LG G Watch is sweet, and with a price tag of $229, it's really easy to make it an impulse buy. I mean, if you're buying a decent watch anyway, you're likely going to be in the neighborhood of $300-500. And those watches won't show you Facebook notifi...
Veröffentlicht: 2014-11-27, Autor: Jonathan , Testbericht von: pcauthority.com.au
Other than this annoying niggle, it's a promising start for Google's fledgling wearables OS. It's heartening to see that there's a decent selection of apps already, some of which provide a tempting glimpse of what's to come. We can see the platform takin...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
(50%)
Veröffentlicht: 2014-09-22, Autor: Daniel , Testbericht von: ausdroid.net
Excellent battery life, Industry standard 22mm Interchangeable bands, Dust and Waterproof, Charging Cradle is easy to use
Really not the most innovative design, No ambient light sensor, Always on display while charging
As soon as Android Wear appeared on Google Play, there was only one choice available for immediate purchase, the LG G Watch. That was all that was behind my decision to purchase the LG over the Samsung. If Samsung had actually gone live at the same time, ...
