Testseek.de haben 418 Experten-Bewertungen der Samsung SM-A500 Galaxy A5 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 79% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Samsung SM-A500 Galaxy A5.
January 2015
(79%)
418 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
(80%)
157 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
790100418
Die Autoren gefallen
Hochwertiges Design & Verarbeitungsqualitat
Sehr gutes Full-HD-Display (nur A5)
Sehr gute Kamera
Performance
Speicher erweiterbar
Fingerabdrucksensor (nur A5)
Hochwertige Verarbeitung und
Dennoch einen erweiterbaren Speicher
Gute technische Ausstattung samt Fingerabdruckscanner
Great design and build, AMOLED display for rich visuals, Always On display
Camera could be better, last year's software
For a phone that costs less than £400, the Galaxy A5 is impressive in its design and build. Even its display and performance punch beyond that price point. In many ways it's a cheaper version of the Galaxy S7, except it doesn't really feel cheap at all wh...
The Galaxy A5 found itself lost in the shuffle last year because its price was awkwardly positioned between better-value, lower-end phones and faster mid-range phones. This year, with its price bump and processor boost, it may be able to shake that off, b...
Under £300, Beautiful build quality, Expandable storage, 4G connectivity
Runs Android KitKat, small battery, Still has old TouchWiz, Underpowered Processor, Shaky camera output in lowlight conditions
The Galaxy A5 has taken on the beautiful build quality that we first saw in the Galaxy Alpha and brought it to a very affordable price point. There are a few hits and misses- the camera could have been better, we would have loved to have Lollipop as oppo...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
(70%)
Veröffentlicht: 2015-05-11, Autor: Alun , Testbericht von: theregister.co.uk
The Samsung Galaxy A5 is a bit pricey for a mid-ranger, but it has the looks and build quality of a flagship. It costs £150 more than the Motorola Moto G but you are getting a significantly more appealing bit of kit for your money. HTC's Eye is more power...
Veröffentlicht: 2015-04-30, Autor: Jim , Testbericht von: techadvisor.co.uk
When put next to the Galaxy S5, it's hard to find reasons to buy the A5 instead. It's not a bad phone, but the S5 is simply better value now that it has dropped in price....
Zusammenfassung: The Samsung Galaxy A5 is part of the South Korean handset maker's full-metal step forward, delivering a slick handset in a firm chassis that doesn't feel flimsy. For £349, the Galaxy A5 is a 5.2-inch mid-range blower that measures up at just 6.9mm. Is it ...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
(80%)
Veröffentlicht: 2015-03-13, Autor: Mike , Testbericht von: pocket-lint.com
Delightful design (prefer it to SGS5), bright and colourful display, fair price makes more sense than original Galaxy Alpha, powerful enough to cater for most, 4G connectivity
Outspecced by Sony Z3 Compact, not Android Lollipop (which we think will smooth out OS slickness), would like a more significant battery, low-light camera ability
As a nod to where Samsung is heading with design, the Galaxy A5 is a great example of quality. Indeed, we'd rather have one in the pocket than the flagship Galaxy S5 - but that's just about to be replaced with the S6 come April, which fuses the best...
Flagship-like quality on a budget, Lengthy battery life, Versatile camera
Middling performance
With Samsung's as-yet-unreleased Galaxy S8 already grabbing headlines, the Samsung Galaxy A5 is in danger of having its thunder stolen. Don't disregard this little mid-range handset just yet, though. It's just the ticket if you're not fond of handing over...
Veröffentlicht: 2015-02-27, Autor: Dave , Testbericht von: wired.co.uk
Stylish and slim design, quality HD screen, decent quadcore processor, 13megapixel camera with 5megapixel camera on front, expandable memory
Not cheap
For around a £100 more than the A3, the Galaxy A5 has a bigger, better quality screen a superior camera, and the processor has been beefed up a little to cope with the greater demands placed on it. It's a sleek-looking device and a pretty good performer ...
Overall screen quality / excellent responsiveness, Slimline and welldesigned, Generally responsive, Quality and varied usage of the front camera
Screen resolution, Quality of graphics was distinctly average during games, Battery life could have been better, 13 Megapixel back camera is average, Android 4.4 KitKat and not Lollipop (5.0)
What's happened, Samsung? The brand's rushed and rather desperate attempt to claw back its monopoly of the mobile market by clumsily producing a series of duplicates has spawned a Galaxy A—a series which has struggled to garner interest, while its competi...
