Testseek.de haben 54 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD FX-8120 3.1GHz socket AM3 Plus und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 82% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD FX-8120 3.1GHz socket AM3 Plus.
(82%)
54 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
The CPU presentation box is very special, much more interesting than the solution chosen by Intel; the included CPU cooler is pretty loud and we recommend acquiring a custom cooling solution right from the start. By using a high-end air CPU cooler, ...
Good performance in multithread programs, Availability, Price
Bad performance in single thread, Power consumption (especially if overclocked)
FX-8120, like the Bulldozer platform in whole, is bit of a weird product on the market. While it has mediocre performance in multithreaded programs, it falls far behind similarly priced Intel processors in singlethreaded programs. Intel i5 2500K did b...
Two months ago when we tested the top desktop Bulldozer processor, we concluded that it turned out a big disappointment. The results of our today’s FX series testing, including lower-cost CPU modifications, didn’t change out opinion. Processors on Bul...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2011-11-07, Autor: Carl , Testbericht von: HardCOREware.net
Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...
This really isn't easy for me. Here at Motherboards.Org I have the reputation for being a bit of an AMD fan boy when it comes to their processors. I've always favored NVIDIA because of their design and the fact that they are generally quieter than AMD's g...
Zusammenfassung: AMD FX 8150 - 8120 - 6100 and 4100 performance reviewYesterday AMD released the FX series Zambezi - Bulldozer based processor. Everybody has been focusing on that most high-end AMD FX 8150 processor. However there where three other processors released.Thi...
Improved idle power consumption over Phenom II, Nicely packaged
Struggles to match a four year old design, Uses a lot of power, Poor performance/watt ratio, Gets defeated by CPUs with half the cores
The AMD Bulldozer architecture certainly has its advantages when the applications can utilise all of the cores and threads when you compare it to their older Phenom II range of processors. However, in certain games, it does appear to perform worse. Ev...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
Auszeichnung
-
Veröffentlicht: 2012-07-24, Autor: Chris , Testbericht von: expertreviews.co.uk
It's a niche product and Intel's processors are generally faster, but this good-value Bulldozer chip is still the king of multitasking...
