Testseek.de haben 224 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 67% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
(67%)
224 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Modular and versatile architecture, Great performance in multithreaded applications, Great overclocking potential
General performance below expectations, and rival products, High power consumption under load, compared to Intel's chips, Not the best choice for hardcore gamers
AMD Bulldozer is with us for months now, more than enough time has passed for the product to set into its market slot. Bulldozer and AMD did not live up to expectations, nor did they deliver a competitive desktop product which they very much need right...
Zusammenfassung: This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...
New processor architectures don’t come round all that often and there was a great deal of excitement in anticipation of Bulldozer. Breaking with the traditional vision of cores, its CMT architecture was indeed promising on paper but its integration wit...
Performance in highly threaded programs, Overclocking
Single core performance
This is the first time we've had the chance to put the new architecture to test and unfortunately it turned out to be a bit of a let-down. In multi-threaded applications the performance is good, and the chip does overclock very nicely, but for average...
Zusammenfassung: While Turbo Core did not help the Unigine Tropics frame-rate, the CPU was left running much warmer. In addition, the overall system power consumption was up. In this brief look at Cool 'n' Quiet and Turbo Core 2.0 for AMD's latest-generation Bulldoze...
Zusammenfassung: GCC 4.6 and 4.7 had regressed with GraphicsMagick when setting the first-generation Bulldozer optimizations while the Open64 performance was not affected. However, when enabling the highest optimization level with bdver1, the regression was erased. ...
While we don't want to give the impression that the i7-3930K is a slow CPU for consumer applications and games, it isn't significantly faster than the Core i7-2600K. This is a problem for Intel, as the i7-3930K is almost exactly double the price; LGA20...
Veröffentlicht: 2011-11-07, Autor: Carl , Testbericht von: HardCOREware.net
Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...
Zusammenfassung: We’ve been presenting a lot of new AMD products lately. APUs are slowly descending into the mainstream, and the very philosophy of using the PC has changed together with user needs. Making a brute-force CPU isn’t all that hard to do, but the balance of...
In every game we played so far between the AMD FX-8150 and Intel 2500K, not once did the AMD FX-8150 come out on top with a dual or triple-GPU configuration. Even when performance was "similar," the Intel CPU still held a certain percentage of performance...
