Testseek.de haben 64 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 82% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
March 2015
(82%)
64 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
(94%)
44 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
82010064
Die Autoren gefallen
Ausreichend hohe Leistung
Deutlich sparsamer als andere FX-Modelle
Günstiger Preis
Die Autoren nicht gefallen hat
Vergleichsweise hohe Leistungsaufnahme
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Tests
seite 3 von 7
Sortierung:
Punktzahl
Veröffentlicht: 2015-01-21, Autor: Mark , Testbericht von: overclock3d.net
When AMD first released CPUs for their AM3+ platform we at OC3D were not overly impressed, behind the hype of AMD's "Bulldozer" architecture was some very power hungry, hot running and under-performing CPUs. When AMD's second generation of FX CPUs, Pile...
Veröffentlicht: 2015-01-20, Autor: Ian , Testbericht von: anandtech.com
Anyone building a new performance system today is not exactly spoiled for choice. On the super extreme end, native octo-core processors with threading are in the market. AMD's high end FX models start by comparison to the Core i5 line but boasts double th...
After spending time with both the AMD FX-8320E and the MSI 970 Gaming I came out with a mostly positive outlook. For starters, the board is packed full of features and is selling for a great price. When you combine the board with the FX-8320E you have a...
Veröffentlicht: 2015-01-04, Autor: David , Testbericht von: benchmarkreviews.com
8 cores for not much cash, Overclockabilty, Strong performance in heavily threaded workloads, Potential performance win with DX12, No real reason to spend more for an FX9590
Far behind Intel on a percore basis, Powerhungry even at stock clock speeds, Aggressively throttles when overclocked via turbo multiplier
There is no “fastest processor”. When planning your rig, you'll need to make a choice between core count and clock speed . Up until now, the argument for choosing more cores has boiled down to whether or not you regularly perform tasks that spawn lots of ...
Excellent Multi-threading Performance, Very Reasonable Price, Strong Overclocking Potential
Lack Luster Single Threaded Performance
The new AMD FX 8320E is far from ground breaking. It does not really need to be either. Its multi-threading prowess would make the Intel i3 an easy target. The FX 8320E is a wolf in sheep's clothing. It's mild 3.2 GHz base clock and low power label makes ...
I rather have four cores that are twice as fast per core opposed to 8 cores that are slower, so again I'll say this, personally I would have preferred a faster per core performing AMD quad-core processor. realistically, we have been working with the FX 8...
Zusammenfassung: That the fastest processors are currently made by Intel is not really a secret, but what is the best choice when you want to spend up to £ 50, £100 or £150? To answer that question we conducted a megatest of 57 current AMD and Intel CPUs. From two to...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2015-02-28, Autor: Dave , Testbericht von: techradar.com
A decent upgrade for an existing AMD setup, relatively cheap
Old, old tech, still more power, hungry than Intel, no native USB 3.0 or PCIe support
The cheapest eight-threaded CPU around, but there are better options if you don't need that sort of multi-threaded capability....
Veröffentlicht: 2015-01-08, Autor: Stuart , Testbericht von: hardwareheaven.com
With the FX-8320e AMD have managed to create a very well balanced CPU. It offers performance very close to the more expensive 8370e however does so at a lower price point and with a touch less heat/power use. The CPU performs best in tasks which fully tak...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
Auszeichnung
-
Veröffentlicht: 2015-01-02, Autor: Ryan , Testbericht von: HEXUS.net
Strong multi-core performance, Excellent value for money, Easy upgrade for AM3+ owners
Power savings are small, Limited single-core speed
The addition of E-Series parts to AMD's FX eight-core line of processors may not be glamorous but, we believe, it's a positive move that AMD is giving consumers a greater range of options. AMD doesn't charge a premium for the FX-8320E and FX-8370E suggest...
