Testseek.de haben 266 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 79% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
(93%)
2719 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
790100266
Die Autoren gefallen
Preis/Leistung
Overclocking Reserven
Kompatibilität zu bestehenden AM3+ Sockel
Schnelle Spiele-CPU
Die Autoren nicht gefallen hat
Im Single Core Betrieb immer noch zu Schwach
Der FX-8350 Black Edition von AMD erhält zusammenfassend von OverclockingStation den wohlverdienten "Preis/Leistung
Teils deutlich langsamer als günstigere Ivy-Bridge-Vierkerner
Zusammenfassung: Late May we published a huge round-up of 45 desktop processors , followed by a review of Intel's fourth generation Core processors . Our readers immediately, and understandably, came with the request for a similar group test of laptop processors. It's a...
Zusammenfassung: On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2013-04-08, Autor: James , Testbericht von: micromart.co.uk
Zusammenfassung: AMD's Piledriver line (which succeeds Bulldozer) has been attempting to pull back ground from Intel since its release, primarily through aggressive discounts. One of the few AMD chips that can even start to compete on performance grounds is this, the eigh...
Zusammenfassung: AMD and Intel continue serving up increasingly faster CPUs. But graphics card performance is accelerating even faster. Is there still such a thing as processor-bound gaming? We take two Radeon HD 7970s, high-end desktop CPUs, and a few games to find ou...
Zusammenfassung: Earlier this month we looked at the gaming performance in Windows 8 compared to Windows 7 , and it turns out there was no difference. Afterwards our loyal readers asked us to apply our expertise to the processor performance in Windows 8, to find out whe...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
-
Veröffentlicht: 2012-11-08, Autor: Dave , Testbericht von: techradar.com
Good stable overclock, Great multi, treaded performance, Good value for money
Definite clock for clock improvement over Bulldozer, Increased clock speeds whilst keeping the same TDP, Competes against the Intel Core i5 3570K in lots of tasks, Good performance for the money
High power consumption is still an issue, Single threaded performance still needs improvement, 32nm technology, Intel are on 22nm
AMD have certainly raised the game with the revised version of Bulldozer, known now as Piledriver. However, we have not seen the quoted 'up to 23%' improvement which AMD said there should be. Obviously, that is in an ideal world it may be that big of ...
Zusammenfassung: The first generation processors based on AMD's Bulldozer architecture did not meet expectations, so AMD is making a second attempt today, with FX 2.0 or Vishera. The Piledriver cores are a refinement and further development of Bulldozer, that are suppos...
Zusammenfassung: It is just over a year since AMD launched its flagship consumer CPU. Probably known to you as 'Bulldozer' and brought to market under the performance-intimating FX branding, AMD's grounds-up design, comprised of up to eight cores, generally failed to win ...
