Testseek.de haben 266 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 79% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
(93%)
2719 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
790100266
Die Autoren gefallen
Preis/Leistung
Overclocking Reserven
Kompatibilität zu bestehenden AM3+ Sockel
Schnelle Spiele-CPU
Die Autoren nicht gefallen hat
Im Single Core Betrieb immer noch zu Schwach
Der FX-8350 Black Edition von AMD erhält zusammenfassend von OverclockingStation den wohlverdienten "Preis/Leistung
Teils deutlich langsamer als günstigere Ivy-Bridge-Vierkerner
then. I'll keep saying this, personally I would have preferred a faster per core performing AMD quad-core processor rather then an eight-core processor with reduced nice per core performance. However we do have to be clear here, we have been working with...
Good Performance, Decent Overclocker, Improved Efficiency, Easy Upgrade For Existing AMD Owners
Dated Platform, Intel CPUs Still Clearly Faster
Even before AMD officially released its Bulldozer-based FX-Series of desktop processors last year, the company was already talking about the follow-on microarchitecture codenamed “Piledriver”. In fact, in the conclusion of our launch article featuring the...
Eight cores and 5GHz on your desktop computer, Officially supports DDR31866 memory, Better performance than Intel on multithreaded tasks, An FX system has 38 usable PCIE lanes as opposed to the 24 lanes of a Sandy Bridge system, Excellent price/performance ratio, finally competitive with Intel in the $200 CPU range,
Single core performance still lags far behind Intel, Few programs use new FX instructions like fused multiplyadd, so the full performance potential remains untapped
Benchmark tests should always be taken with a grain of salt. It's difficult to try and isolate the performance difference a single component in a computer system makes, especially when it's necessary to compare across different manufacturers and platf...
We are big fans of AMD here at OC3D. Not only did we start with AMD CPUs back in the Thunderbird days, but as people who like technology in all forms it's important that all the major manufacturers have healthy competition. Just as the Pentium III was out...
Veröffentlicht: 2012-10-23, Autor: Steven , Testbericht von: techspot.com
Zusammenfassung: About this time last year, AMD's new Bulldozer-based FX series launched to bright-eyed system builders who expected the new architecture to challenge Intel's increasingly comfortable position in the upper-end processor market. Unfortunately, Bulldozer was...
Zusammenfassung: Today, AMD is releasing its second-generation of FX CPUs, dubbed “Vishera.” The FX-8350 is currently the highest-end model available, running at 4 GHz and costing USD 195. Let’s see how it fares against its main competitor, the Core i5-3470 (3.2 GHz, U...
This is one of those occasions where AMD has done their job well, but we can’t really celebrate quite yet. The new flagship AMD FX-8350 “Vishera” definitively takes the title of champion amongst AMD processors. The Phenom II 1100T 6-core CPU can’t even...
Veröffentlicht: 2012-10-22, Autor: Victor , Testbericht von: Bjorn3d.com
Piledriver is what Bulldozer should have been in the first place. The FX-8350 puts AMD back on track, but not yet back in the game. If it were not for Intel's exceptional high IPC and performance per watts ratio on Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge, AMD's Vishera/P...
Veröffentlicht: 2012-10-22, Autor: Scott , Testbericht von: Techreport.com
You've probably gathered that the FX-8350 improves on its Bulldozer-based precursor pretty handily for a chip that's neither a die shrink nor an all-new architecture. The final verdict on the FX-8350 isn't terribly difficult to render, but it does have s...
While AMD is trying to make a value statement with its new FX-8350 (selling for $219 at time of publication), it simply will not be able to do so in the enthusiast arena. Perhaps, if we find that the $169 FX-8320 turns out to be a healthy overclocker, it...
