Testseek.de haben 79 Experten-Bewertungen der Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 81% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066.
December 2017
(81%)
79 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
(83%)
143 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
81010079
Die Autoren gefallen
7Zip v18.03
Cinebench R15
Handbrake 1.10 YT60p
Handbrake 1.10 HEVC4K
Lightroom Classic 2018
Premiere Pro CC 2018
Sehr hohe Performance in Multithreading-Anwendungen
Hohe Performance auch bei Anwendungen mit geringem Multithreading
Akzeptabler Stromverbrauch unter Last
Guter Stromverbrauch unter Idle-Bedingungen
Enorm starke CPU
Akzeptable TDP
Die Autoren nicht gefallen hat
Sehr hoher Kaufpreis
Overclocking aufgrund der Kernanzahl schwierig
Für einen richtigen Core i9-7980XE-Rechner muss man tief in die Tasche greifen
Veröffentlicht: 2017-09-27, Autor: Bob , Testbericht von: thinkcomputers.org
16 cores, 32-threads, Incredible multi-threaded performance, Good temperatures at default speeds, 35% performance increase over the i9-7900X
You'll need a good motherboard for overclocking, Quite expensive
As I said in my review of the Core i9-7980XE we are living in a very exciting time for CPUs. This processor is packing in 16-cores, 32-threads and it is not even at the top of the product stack! At its default clock speeds it is a work horse! It is going...
Poor thermal dissipation, Requires water cooling, Power consumption, Price
The Core i9-7960X offers the best performance from a 16-core processor in both lightly-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. Expect to pay for the privilege of owning one, though. Moreover, thermal challenges dictate that expensive add-ons like custo...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-09-25, Autor: Mark , Testbericht von: arstechnica.com
The fastest slice of silicon going, Good gaming performance, Improved memory support, Modern complement of I/O
Not that much faster than Threadripper 1950X, Fewer PCIe lanes than the competition, Power hungry, Continual use of TIM instead of solder, High clock speeds and quiet systems out of the question without custom liquid cooling or delidding
That Intel finds itself in a place where its flagship processors just barely scrape past the competition is an astonishing turn of events. It might well continue to offer the best gaming performance in the mainstream, where gaming continues to be the key...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-09-25, Autor: Michael , Testbericht von: phoronix.com
The results basically speak for themselves. If you would like to compare your own system(s) Linux performance against the results found in this article, simply install the Phoronix Test Suite and run phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1709241-TY-INTELCORE86...
Zusammenfassung: Intel. Strikes. Back. The massive 18-core Core i9-7980X and 16-core Core i8-7960X are the chipmaker's response to AMD's Ryzen Threadripper, which has been eating Intel's lunch for many months.But can Goliath Intel rise from its stunning defeat to challeng...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-09-25, Autor: Matt , Testbericht von: computershopper.com
Similar performance, in many relevant instances, to Intel's pricier 18-core chip, Compatible Core X-Series motherboards start at lower prices than boards for AMD's Threadripper
$700 pricier than AMD's competing 16-core counterpart
Intel's 16-core Core i9 chip hews close to its pricier 18-core Core i9 Extreme Edition counterpart. It's a powerful chip, no denying, but AMD's competing Threadripper 1950X, at many hundreds of bucks less, is strong competition. Read More...
Zusammenfassung: Intel. Strikes. Back. The massive 18-core Core i9-7980X and 16-core Core i8-7960X are the chipmaker's response to AMD's Ryzen Threadripper, which has been eating Intel's lunch for many months.But can Goliath Intel rise from its stunning defeat to challeng...
We had a blast testing these monster CPU's out. Every single benchmark we ran was just crushed, and every single chart we have had to be expanded by nearly double to accommodate the multi-threaded scores. We had a few testing programs not know quite what...
Well one thing is for sure, you can't call the new addition to the Core-X lineup slow. While I was only able to test two of the four new CPUs. Both were very impressive in just about every test I ran. It was especially impressive in the tests that are...
