Testseek.de haben 348 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 88% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
April 2017
(88%)
348 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
-
0 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
880100348
Die Autoren gefallen
PCIe-x16-Slots mit zusätzlicher Armor-Verstärkung
LED-Beleuchtung mit Mystic-Light-Software und RGB-Header
Gute Lüftersteuerung im UEFI
DDR4-Speicher mit Memory-Try-It und A-XMP-Unterstützung
M.2-Port mit 32-Gbit/s-Anbindung
Board in schwarz und weiß
7Zip v18.03
Cinebench R15
Handbrake 1.10 YT60p
Handbrake 1.10 HEVC4K
Lightroom Classic 2018
Premiere Pro CC 2018
Sechs Kerne und zwölf Threads
Sehr hohe Office-Leistung
Hohe Spiele-Leistung
DDR4-2667-Unterstützung
ECC-Speicher-Support
Frei bestimmbarer Multiplikator
Geforce GTX 980 Ti @ 1.380/3.900 MHz
8 GiByte per memory channel with max. speeds according to each CPUs' specification
Windows 10 (64 Bit)
Turbo & SMT on
1.280 x 720
Max. Details (minimal or no PostProcessing i.e. Ambient Occlusion or Bloom)
No AA/
Hohes Arbeitstempo
Hohes Tempo bei komplexen Berechnungen
Geringer Stromverbrauch
Sechs Kerne
Virtuelle Kernverdoppelung
Hohe Spieleleistung
Sehr hohe Anwendungsleistung
Relativ niedrige Leistungsaufnahme unter Last
Niedrige Temperaturen unter Last
Recht hohe Taktraten für eine Sechskern-CPU
Freier Multiplikator und hilfreiche S
Sehr starke Performance
6 Kerne & hohe Taktfrequenz
Starke Preisgestaltung
Die Autoren nicht gefallen hat
Nur vier SATA-6-Gbps-Port
Nur zwei Ports abgewinkelt
USB-Typ-C-Anschluss nur mit USB-3.1-Gen1-Anbindung
Convincingly beats the Core i5-7600K "Kaby Lake", Trades blows with costlier i7-7700K in some tests, Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack), Single-threaded performance improved over previous generation, Unlocked multiplier,
Gaming frame rates lower than competing Intel chips, High power draw, Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited, Setup complicated (memory, HPET, CCX, SMT, and power profile), Overclocking barely worth it, Requires optimized apps of which
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X currently retails for $250. Convincingly beats the Core i5-7600K "Kaby Lake" Trades blows with costlier i7-7700K in some tests Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack) Single-threaded performance impro...
Very Competitive Pricing (Both CPU and Board), Very Good Multi-tasking Performance (CPU), 14nm Process Allows For Cool and Efficient Operation (CPU), Platform Cost Low Compared To Intel's Offerings, 6 Core, 12 Threads In The Price Bracket of Non-Threaded
Gaming Performance Not On Par With Competition, Limited Overclocking Potential on Ryzen Processors, AM4 Motherboards Not Compatible With High Speed DDR4 DIMMs (yet), Not many applications optimized for Ryzen Processors, No integrated graphics across all R
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Paul , Testbericht von: tomshardware.com
Strength in heavily threaded workloads, Superior pricetoperformance ratio for budget workstations, Unlocked ratio multiplier
High price relative to Core i57600K, Lower overclocking headroom
The Ryzen 5 1600X provides a tremendous price-to-performance ratio for budget workstations that rivals Intel's Broadwell-E offerings. Ryzen 5 also provides playable performance in most games, but it lags the Intel competition and doesn't have as much...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Ryan , Testbericht von: pcper.com
When AMD launched the Ryzen 7 processors last month to a substantial amount of fanfare and pent up excitement, we already knew that the Ryzen 5 launch would be following close behind. While the Ryzen 7 lineup was meant to compete with the Intel Core i7 Ka...
Republished with permission from:Steven Walton is a writer at TechSpot. TechSpot is a computer technology publication serving PC enthusiasts, gamers and IT pros since 1998...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Marco , Testbericht von: hothardware.com
Strong Overall Performance, Up To 6-Cores / 12-Threads, Power Friendly, Aggressive Pricing
Performance Anomalies In A Few Benchmarks, Lack-Luster Overclocking In Early Stages
With that said, though lower-resolution game performance with non-optimized titles remains an issue for Ryzen, that situation is improving. A recent patch for Ashes of the Singularity doesn't put Ryzen on the same level as Intel's high-end processors, but...
Zusammenfassung: AMD's $250 Ryzen 5 1600X is here to challenge Intel's quad-core, $250 Core i5-7600K for the honor of being “The People's CPU.” Everyone likes to read about expensive, gold-plated, $1,000 parts, but in the real world, most people can't or won't spend that...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Ian , Testbericht von: anandtech.com
We have already shown in previous reviews that the Zen microarchitecture from AMD is around the equivalent of Intel's Broadwell microarchitecture, but at this lower price point we have AMD's Zen against Intel's Kaby Lake, which is two generations newer th...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Jeff , Testbericht von: Techreport.com
—for now Let's sum up the performance of our group of test CPUs using one of our famous value scatter plots. The best values in gaming smoothness from this group of chips will tend toward the upper left of the plot, where prices are lowest and performance...
After Ryzen 7 the tide has now turned to Ryzen 5, and it has been an interesting time for AMD. The processor launch has been good, but not great. The Ryzen platform is still a little immature. This mainly focuses on memory compatibility and somewhat lower...
