Testseek.de haben 348 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 88% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
April 2017
(88%)
348 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
-
0 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
880100348
Die Autoren gefallen
PCIe-x16-Slots mit zusätzlicher Armor-Verstärkung
LED-Beleuchtung mit Mystic-Light-Software und RGB-Header
Gute Lüftersteuerung im UEFI
DDR4-Speicher mit Memory-Try-It und A-XMP-Unterstützung
M.2-Port mit 32-Gbit/s-Anbindung
Board in schwarz und weiß
7Zip v18.03
Cinebench R15
Handbrake 1.10 YT60p
Handbrake 1.10 HEVC4K
Lightroom Classic 2018
Premiere Pro CC 2018
Sechs Kerne und zwölf Threads
Sehr hohe Office-Leistung
Hohe Spiele-Leistung
DDR4-2667-Unterstützung
ECC-Speicher-Support
Frei bestimmbarer Multiplikator
Geforce GTX 980 Ti @ 1.380/3.900 MHz
8 GiByte per memory channel with max. speeds according to each CPUs' specification
Windows 10 (64 Bit)
Turbo & SMT on
1.280 x 720
Max. Details (minimal or no PostProcessing i.e. Ambient Occlusion or Bloom)
No AA/
Hohes Arbeitstempo
Hohes Tempo bei komplexen Berechnungen
Geringer Stromverbrauch
Sechs Kerne
Virtuelle Kernverdoppelung
Hohe Spieleleistung
Sehr hohe Anwendungsleistung
Relativ niedrige Leistungsaufnahme unter Last
Niedrige Temperaturen unter Last
Recht hohe Taktraten für eine Sechskern-CPU
Freier Multiplikator und hilfreiche S
Sehr starke Performance
6 Kerne & hohe Taktfrequenz
Starke Preisgestaltung
Die Autoren nicht gefallen hat
Nur vier SATA-6-Gbps-Port
Nur zwei Ports abgewinkelt
USB-Typ-C-Anschluss nur mit USB-3.1-Gen1-Anbindung
The AMD Ryzen 5 processor launch is very similar feel to the Ryzen 7 launch as the multi-threaded performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X and 1500X were most impressive. Single threaded workloads or very lightly threaded workloads still run better on Intel h...
Well, the performance is pleasantly surprising. The 1500X, in most cases, performed on par with the i7-7700K. Even though you can overclock the i7 further, the MSRP of the Ryzen 5 1500X is only $189. That's a monstrous difference in price/performance. E...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Bruno , Testbericht von: reviewstudio.net
performance, overclocking, power consumption, value
AMD Ryzen 7 produced a revolution in the 8-core area, offering at least the same performance as Intel LGA2011 counterparts, but at half price. Now Ryzen 5 came to compete with LGA1151 solutions, and AMD banged Intel's head again with 1600X, a 6-core/12-th...
War diese Bewertung hilfreich?
(95%)
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Steven , Testbericht von: techspot.com
Exceptional value compared to their Intel Core i5 counterparts. Ryzen holds a clear lead in productivity performance, though gaming performance is more evenly matched between Intel and AMD
Power efficiency goes right out the window once you start overclocking
Using AMD's stock coolers, the standard 1500X idled at 35 degrees and peaked at 68 degrees using the Wraith Spire. When overclocked to 3.95GHz, however, its temperatures increased to 42 degrees at idle and 88 degrees under load. That said, the heatsink wa...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Ron , Testbericht von: modders-inc.com
Zusammenfassung: The sub-$250 CPU price point is the sweet spot where most system builders look at for their next CPU choice. In this area, creators, gamers and casual system builders intersect and overlap with their computing needs. Intel's 4-core/4-threaded i5 processor...
Well, the Ryzen 7 launch has a surprising amount of excitement and drama mixed together with the impressive numbers but with memory issues and game performance causing very polarized opinions on social media and on websites like Reddit. AMD fans even...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Tom , Testbericht von: overclock3d.net
Zusammenfassung: Since the launch of the FX8 series of processors AMD have fallen into the sector of the market that is best described by the old "good value for money" adage, which is usually a pejorative way of saying that the performance wasn't all that but they're che...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Steve , Testbericht von: gamersnexus.net
Zusammenfassung: Following our in-depth Ryzen VR benchmark (R7 1700 vs. i7-7700K with the Rift + Vive), we immediately began compiling results for the concurrent R5 test efforts by GN Sr. Editor Patrick Lathan. Working together, we were able to knock-out the VR benchmarks...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-03-22, Autor: Steven , Testbericht von: techspot.com
For such a small six-game sample, those benchmarks showed quite a few interesting results. Perhaps the most exciting conclusion we can draw is that upcoming six-core Ryzen processors should perform roughly on par with eight-core models when playing today'...
Veröffentlicht: 2018-05-06, Autor: Peter , Testbericht von: eteknix.com
For the desktop PC gamer, the higher TDP X models are still the go-to for gaming and general performance though. They're a little faster, and a little more expensive, but you get what you pay for. However, if heat and power are a big concern to you, and t...
