Testseek.de haben 348 Experten-Bewertungen der AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 und die durchschnittliche Bewertung beträgt 88% erhoben. Blättern Sie nach unten und sehen Sie alle Beiträge zu AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
April 2017
(88%)
348 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Experten, die dieses Produkt bewertet haben.
Nutzer
-
0 Tests
Durchschnittliche Punktzahl von Produktbesitzern.
880100348
Die Autoren gefallen
PCIe-x16-Slots mit zusätzlicher Armor-Verstärkung
LED-Beleuchtung mit Mystic-Light-Software und RGB-Header
Gute Lüftersteuerung im UEFI
DDR4-Speicher mit Memory-Try-It und A-XMP-Unterstützung
M.2-Port mit 32-Gbit/s-Anbindung
Board in schwarz und weiß
7Zip v18.03
Cinebench R15
Handbrake 1.10 YT60p
Handbrake 1.10 HEVC4K
Lightroom Classic 2018
Premiere Pro CC 2018
Sechs Kerne und zwölf Threads
Sehr hohe Office-Leistung
Hohe Spiele-Leistung
DDR4-2667-Unterstützung
ECC-Speicher-Support
Frei bestimmbarer Multiplikator
Geforce GTX 980 Ti @ 1.380/3.900 MHz
8 GiByte per memory channel with max. speeds according to each CPUs' specification
Windows 10 (64 Bit)
Turbo & SMT on
1.280 x 720
Max. Details (minimal or no PostProcessing i.e. Ambient Occlusion or Bloom)
No AA/
Hohes Arbeitstempo
Hohes Tempo bei komplexen Berechnungen
Geringer Stromverbrauch
Sechs Kerne
Virtuelle Kernverdoppelung
Hohe Spieleleistung
Sehr hohe Anwendungsleistung
Relativ niedrige Leistungsaufnahme unter Last
Niedrige Temperaturen unter Last
Recht hohe Taktraten für eine Sechskern-CPU
Freier Multiplikator und hilfreiche S
Sehr starke Performance
6 Kerne & hohe Taktfrequenz
Starke Preisgestaltung
Die Autoren nicht gefallen hat
Nur vier SATA-6-Gbps-Port
Nur zwei Ports abgewinkelt
USB-Typ-C-Anschluss nur mit USB-3.1-Gen1-Anbindung
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-12, Autor: Luke , Testbericht von: kitguru.net
Superb multi-threaded computational performance that obliterates the Core i5-7600K, Multi-threaded performance makes the i7-7700K and i7-6800K look like poor value for money, Plenty of spare computational capacity for game streamers, Power consumption num
Gaming performance is not as strong as Intel's competition, which is disappointing for this market segment, Kaby Lake competition has significantly better single-threaded performance, Maximum frequency achievable is limited, especially compared to Intel's
With Ryzen 5, AMD builds upon the foundations set by the flagship 8C16T Ryzen 7 processors, and that's generally a good thing.Performance in multi-threaded workloads is in a different league to Intel's price-comparable competitor processors. Ryzen 5 happi...
As unsurprising as the results are given we're just dealing with a similar CPU to the Ryzen 7 trio, just with fewer cores and threads, they are still significant regarding what the Ryzen 5 1600X means in terms of shaking up the mid-range CPU market. Here...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Peter , Testbericht von: eteknix.com
Best price vs performance Ryzen chip to date, 6-Core w/ 12 Threads, AM4 Platform and features, XFR overclocking, Easy to manually overclock, Beats out many more expensive Intel products, Great for gaming/streaming,
None, Neutral, Memory latency is still a little high but it has improved since Ryzen launched, “If you’re eager to invest in Ryzen but don’t need the more expensive 8-Core R7 chips, then the 1600X is the best that R5 has to offer. It’s perfectly suited to
PricingAt just $249/£200, the AMD Ryzen R5 1600X is one of the most disruptive hardware releases in recent years. Not only does it offer more cores and threads than similarly priced Intel solutions, it manages to give some of Intel's much more expensive s...
Veröffentlicht: 2017-04-11, Autor: Paul , Testbericht von: tomshardware.co.uk
Strength in heavily threaded workloads, Superior pricetoperformance ratio for budget workstations, Unlocked ratio multiplier
High price relative to Core i57600K, Lower overclocking headroom
The Ryzen 5 1600X provides a tremendous price-to-performance ratio for budget workstations that rivals Intel's Broadwell-E offerings. Ryzen 5 also provides playable performance in most games, but it lags the Intel competition and doesn't have as much...
Yes. Whether you're encoding video, streaming and recording while gaming, or compressing and uncompressing large files, you'll see a benefit from the extra cores and higher power draw on the Ryzen 5 1600X. Add that to a precisely targeted price point, and...
Zusammenfassung: The first half of 2017 is proving to be an interesting one for AMD. There's promise of next-generation RX Vega graphics coming to a PC in May or June, bringing much-needed competition to the high-end space, and AMD already has a trio of Ryzen eight-core C...
Solid Multi-Core performance, 1600X is close to 1700 in performance, Both are suitable for gaming, 1600X is also a good option for content creation, New AM4 platform, wide range of motherboards available, Great Value for money at the current prices, Good
Overclocking with the Wraith coolers was limited
Ryzen 5 exceeded my expectations and the 6 core/12 thread 1600X presents a real dilemma for enthusiast gamers given how closely it performs to the Ryzen 7 1700. The 1600X will almost certainly fill the requirements of an enthusiast who games 70% of the ti...
The Ryzen 5 CPUs are pretty much what we expected; slight enhancements in software/microcode with similar multi-core performance that scales with core count and frequency compared to Ryzen 7. At similar price points to Intel's offerings, the multi-threade...
Ryzen 5 exceeded my expectations and the 6 core/12 thread 1600X presents a real dilemma for enthusiast gamers given how closely it performs to the Ryzen 7 1700. The 1600X will almost certainly fill the requirements of an enthusiast who games 70% of the ti...
Ryzen 5 exceeded my expectations and the 6 core/12 thread 1600X presents a real dilemma for enthusiast gamers given how closely it performs to the Ryzen 7 1700. The 1600X will almost certainly fill the requirements of an enthusiast who games 70% of the ti...
